• pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    Democratic governments should allow all voices to be heard, not silence speech they dislike.

    That’s real fucking rich coming from the government that:

    • Removed all references to “trans-” regardless of context.
    • Retaliates against left-leaning press.
    • Calls information they dislike “fake news”.
    • Sends immigrants to concentration camps.
    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Don’t forget

      removed funding for weather services or deleted materials related to climate change

      runs from people trying to ask them questions

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        If we’re adding “runs from people trying to ask them questions”, we should be more accurate about it.

        runs from people trying to ask them questions, calling them plants put there by political opponents

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      That because they don’t want free apeech. They want the speech only if its their speech.

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        They don’t want to be forced to listen to what YOU have to say, but they want to force YOU to listen to what they have to say.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    Translation help from Fascist English to US English:

    • “activist” = a non-politician whose free speech we don’t like
    • “allow all voices to be heard” / “free speech” = extremist/unconstitutional/propaganda speech which serves the interests of the current fascist regime must be allowed, while every other speech will be labelled as being activist/communist/un-American/…
    • “defend […] all Americans” = at least the part of Americans which we tolerate or haven’t jailed yet (subject to change)
  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Is this the same United States that’s investigating people for having unflattering memes of the vice president on their phone?

    Tell us more about the importance of free speech.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s the free speech where they cancel broadcasts they don’t like in exchange for approving corporate mergers.

  • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    As part of a criminal investigation, an activist American payment network is requesting to stop selling video games that they seem inappropriate and has basically treated itch.io, Steam, etc. as an “organized crime group.” Democratic governments should allow all games to be played, not silence things they dislike. The United States will defend the free prudence of all Americans against acts of foreign fun.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Seriously. They should do the rest of the world a favour and close itself off from us. That way we won’t dictate what their idiots can and can’t do or say.

      • downvote_hunter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        No please, don’t leave those of us that are rational in here around with the nut jobs. We’re trying to correct course but these people are nuts

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          “Free speech” doesn’t entitle you to dictate policy over privately held companies. We spent four years trying to convince Trumpers of this. Be smarter.

          • fishy@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            What do you mean, did the Biden admin target any particular shows or networks? Are you also aware the current admin is holding off Paramount’s merger to exert influence over their programming? IDK how free that feels. May not be directly breaking laws, but it’s absolutely a subversion of free speech.

            • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              No, it’s not. Free speech protects what you say from the government, not your employer. Your employer ALSO has free speech, meaning they can decide what can and can’t be said on their property.

              This is like saying Sesame Street doesn’t show hardcore porn and that’s a violation of free speech.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    You have to believe that the French government have evaluated in the same week the risk of recognising Palestine and condemning a US company against how vindictive the US government are right now. Hopefully they stick to their guns on both.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    By condemning this, the “US” is shooting itself in the foot.

    Ever since Twitter owner used Twitter to say Canada “wasn’t a real country”, no Canadian should be using Twitter. That wasn’t just bias, it was an “in your face and screw you” kind of bias.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Martin: Organized crime?
    Cosmo: Hah. Don’t kid yourself. It’s not that organized.

    – Sneakers (1992)

    Twitter is absolutely going to say “well, we’re definitely not an organised hate group. Sometimes people just hate stuff. We’re just a social media platform, helping people organise. Oh shit”

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Requesting information isn’t limiting free speech is it? Now if that algorithm shows it is indeed limiting or promoting people’s speech in a non-equal manner, that would be limiting people’s free speech would it not?