• BoofStroke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck software patents and business method patents. Patent the machine. Copyright the instructions to tell the machine what to do if you must.

    • bitwise@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Copyright won’t help here. Extending it to allow the protection of concepts as well as literal implementation is what Oracle tried to do, and would’ve resulted in a few megacorps demanding licensing for core concepts that no one can really make quality, functional software without.

      Of course, software patents are also stupid, even if the general intent of patents seems reasonable.

      • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Patents should simply be a monopoly on an idea for enough time to gather resources to develop that idea’s prototype. I know it doesn’t work that way, but it should. They really should be there for small inventors, not giant corps who have plenty of resources, but I digress.

        But software itself can implement that prototype without having to build anything. Your ideas can be created directly. We don’t patent math and we don’t patent poetry or even poetic writing structures.

        Software and business method patents are utter bullshit.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        MUCH faster. Patents last 20 years. Software copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author

      • broface@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who cares?

        Just wanna dispel the notion that people only do things for money: you’re posting on Lemmy right now.