Updated the link to a better source that gives a more detailed overview.
Can’t wait to try a real Firefox (with Gecko) on iOS. Maybe it will be better than Safari in some regards, maybe not. But it will be nice to have more than one option to choose from.
Ublock in firefox on ios goes brrr
Headlines like this should be illegal.
Apple is forced by the EU to stop being a dick and open up their ecosystem. Apple is also purposefully making the experience so terrible that nobody will dare use it.
I hope the EU sues and bankrupts them.
Don’t get me wrong, I hope the EU ~slaps Apple on the wrist~ beats Apple up until they properly allow sideloading without the user having to go through more hoops than activating it with a warning and be done with it. Without any other consequences.
But I’d hate if Apple went bankrupt. Leaving only one major player in the mobile OS market? No thanks.
You know what will happen? I do. Apple will leave Europe
Want side loading? Buy android. That’s your choice.
By the way, I read that it’s in the EU. The regulation applies in the EEA (EU+Norway+Iceland+Liechtenstein).
Yet again, we lack the only detail anyone actually cares about: how does Apple plan on actually limiting this functionality to the EU?
It’s difficult for me to imagine how they can comply with this but only for EU customers in a manner which can’t be easily circumvented. It kind of bothers me that journalists just parrot “these changes will not be coming to jurisdictions outside of the EU” uncritically, seemingly just completely taking for granted the idea that there’s not going to be any way to benefit from this if you don’t live in the EU.
Devices are very strictly controlled on a hardware level for the market they are designed to operate in. It’s a requirement to obtain licensing for management of radio spectrum.
It’s trivial for iOS to check the internal hardware of any phone, see that it is an EU export model with all of thr Apple DRM active so you can’t fake it, and adjust accordingly.
Sure but they’re also sold secondhand. Also people can be born in one country, but move to live in another one… bringing their devices with them. Apple’s DRM can’t be tied to hardware.
Also - what if a user doesn’t have an account with Apple at all? How can Apple know what country they’re from? Signing up for an Apple ID is optional when you setup an iPhone - you only really need one to access the App Store and there are now alternative methods available to install apps in the EU.
There are different antennas on different devices, but all of them generally work everywhere in the world - it worst your bandwidth might be a bit lower.
they’re also sold secondhand
Apple probably doesn’t care about that, there aren’t much people who’ll be doing that to warrant worrying about it. I mean, are the very FOSS folks going to switch to Apple just because of this? Unlikely
Also - what if a user doesn’t have an account with Apple at all? How can Apple know what country they’re from?
Defaults based on the model’s market.
Yeah that’s what I’m curious about. I have a US apple account because that’s where I’m from, but I live in the EU and don’t really wanna change accounts or screw with anything.
Two ways:
- Software Country and Region
- By extending the country-specific models Apple already manufactures. For example, Chinese models can shut off WiFi access to any app, and this is only present in Chinese models and can’t be changed with the software Country and Region switch.
i think it would be rather trivial for them to restrict features to secure (not rooted) devices connecting to eu towers via eu carriers (perhaps also owned by eu customers)
Not super familiar with EU law, but it was my understanding that a company that wants to be allowed to operate in the EU can’t just start violating an EU citizen’s EU granted rights just because aren’t literally geographically inside the EU at the time of the rights violation.
In other words, it’s my understanding that Apple would be liable for damages if, for instance, an EU citizen on vacation suddenly lost access to alternative app stores and such.
But you can use iPads and iPhones without a SIM card? I don’t think it’s trivial at all.
So, the .5 per annual install for alternative marketplaces seems to be the stop gap, right? A popular FOSS store like f-droid would have to cough up thousands of Euros.
Would it be possible to sell an alternative marketplace for 1 Euro on the app store, pay Apple’s purchase commission and use the rest for the annual install fee?
Apple may think they’re complying with the letter of the law but I suspect the EU will feel they’re falling far far short of the moral of the law.
They are also apparently requiring a €1,000,000 letter of credit for alternative app stores devs.
Oh, so THAT is the real stop sign they put in front of FOSS marketplaces. Thanks for the link!
That fee also applies to apps published on the app store.
If I understand correctly it only affects apps with more than 1 million annual downloads. I also don’t think it applies to marketplaces, only apps. So if fdroid had a marketplace, the devs would pay that fee and not fdroid.
This article says that the fee applies to every installation of a marketplace.
Apple is not offering these changes outside of the EU because this is not the safest system for our users.
I almost spilled my drink. Apple should do stand-up comedy.
Coming from apple, this means nothing.
Not clear what would happen with in-app purchases.
In before accessing this new app store disables face unlock, NFC, the fingerprint sensor, and voids your warranty.
The update will also open up NFC access to alternative payment apps.
Apple does make it very clear that they’re being forced to do so by law, though, so don’t expect these changes to come out of the EU anytime soon.
