cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/14277007

DeepL:

„Äußerst beunruhigend und unethisch“: Neue Vorschriften erlauben es Ärzten der Veteranenbehörde, Demokraten und unverheiratete Veteranen die Behandlung zu verweigern.

Das Ministerium für Veteranenangelegenheiten erklärt, die Änderungen seien eine Reaktion auf eine Verordnung von Trump zum „Schutz von Frauen“.

  • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    While I’m very against the executive order they describe, the headline is misleading:

    Language requiring healthcare professionals to care for veterans regardless of their politics and marital status has been explicitly eliminated.

    So they can also refuse to treat e.g. republicans and married veterans.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        They are too dim to understand that these dumb laws they’re passing are two-edged swords that can be used against them. Unfortunately, they DO understand that Dems won’t take advantage of these laws.

        SCOTUS gave the president incredible immunity superpowers, knowing HitlerPig would abuse the privilege, but it applied to Biden, too. But did he use his immunity to lock up HitlerPig and all of his henchmen, knowing they were fully guilty of all sorts of treason and corruption? He did not.

    • Goretantath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Problem is that good people wont do that, and bad people side with republicans so the only side thatl get hurt is as the headline describes.

      • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I emotionally agree with you, but really the problem is that… anyone could do that in the future. Denying someone owed care because of political belief is a horrendous situation to explicitly allow, regardless of political affiliation.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just like how the law equally prevents the rich and the poor from sleeping under bridges.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s how it is in “both-sides” lala land but it’s always going to be the pro-fascist side that abuses it the most

      • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure, it’s just important to recognize when abuse happens in the absence of law, and when abuse is law, as it would be for a law targeting Democrats and unmarried explicitly.

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Everything’s politics mfs when I refuse to treat them bcs they don’t like garlic