The Bad Science Behind Trans Medicine Bans - Dissent Magazine
www.dissentmagazine.org
The conservative movement has built its case against gender-affirming care on the authority of anachronistic, faulty clinical research.

The conservative movement has built its case against gender-affirming care on the authority of anachronistic, faulty clinical research.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      5·
      3 months ago

      The difference is that the woman highlighted in that article had complaints about symptoms she was experiencing. Not complaints from other people about who she was. We’ve also learned a lot more since the late 19th century.

      The cherry on top is the last sentence of the article you linked:

      But our main character would finally rest in peace if we could just give the man credit where he so believed it was due – our universal natural bisexuality.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        21·
        3 months ago

        You missed the entire point of the article I think. The point is that what we consider sound science today has a high chance of sounding like absolute nonsense in a few centuries. Therefore saying “read the science” implies that there’s nothing else to discover about the subject. Thats a ridiculous notion.

        And frankly, as many trans activists will say sexual orientation has little to do with being transgender, so I don’t see what you think that last sentence bears of relevance to my point. I agree with it though, if that la worth anything.