HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agoWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1323arrow-down131file-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1292arrow-down1external-linkWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlHiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square99fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoAt least be fair and cut out the .into()
minus-squarenebeker@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoAnd bow to the compiler’s whims? I think not! This shouldn’t compile, because .into needs the type from the left side and let needs the type from the right side.
At least be fair and cut out the
.into()And bow to the compiler’s whims? I think not!
This shouldn’t compile, because .into needs the type from the left side and let needs the type from the right side.