I know this is a dumb question… But i cant really aford a vpn like at all, is it possible to torrent without using a vpn in the USA or will i get in some trouble and go to jail if i torrent without a vpn?

The reason i cant get a vpn is because im just broke and im young enough to live with family so i cant really get a job.

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Do your ISP a favor and use a VPN when torrenting. They will know you’re torrenting based on traffic patterns, but they won’t know what you’re torrenting. That way they don’t have to serve you a notice or kick you off their service at the behest of movie or music studios. Your ISP may not care what you’re doing, but those businesses do, and the law is on their side.

    VPN makes it extremely difficult for your ISP to spy on you, which is the whole point.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    On behalf of whoever is paying for your internet connection, do not torment without a VPN.

    If you ignore this advice, be aware that the aformentioned person will get a nastygram in the mail, complete with the exact title of the torment you downloaded. They have no qualms with outing your darkest perversions to the breadwinner(s) in your household.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    If you are broke and cannot afford a VPN, I suggest you use I2P.

    https://geti2p.net/en/

    I2P is basically an internet protocol that treats all kinds of internet activity in the manner a torrent works.

    Basically, you run a local node.

    Traffic is routed around in a bunch of anonymized, encrypted chunks, from many different users, which are then bunched up together into packets and encrypted again.

    As a client, you can only decrypt the parts of a packet that pertain to you…

    But as a node, you help move packets along to every other person who is running a node, in a sort of meshnet like fashion.

    The result is a free, but very slow, but also pretty well anonymized way of passing net traffic around…

    …and it is also arguably more private/secure than a VPN, which can simply hand over its server logs if legally asked to…

    …and it is also arguably more private/secure than TOR, which can have de-anonymization attacks run on it if enough onion nodes, or your entry/exit nodes, are either comprimised or just outright run as honey pots, which is a thing various law enforcement agencies do.

    However, another downside to I2P is that it is… considerably more technically complex for most users to actually set up and use properly, than just a basic VPN for switching your geoip to watch Brazillian netflix or w/e.

    But, it does allow torrenting and portforwarding, and is totally free.

    Don’t expect to be able to stream any media with it though, it is again very slow.

  • Rabbit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Save your lunch money for however long it takes to be able to buy a year of VPN like Mullvad in your country.

    You aren’t paying for your internet so you’d be an asshole to put the account holder under scrutiny for torrenting without protection. Especially when they are also covering your rent, elecricity, gas, food, clothing, etc. Don’t be a selfish asshole.

    If you can’t get VPN don’t be entitled and go off torrenting because other people say it is fine. You aren’t paying for internet so you don’t get the privilege to decide if it is fine or not.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Private trackers.

    In the USA when you are caught torrenting copyrighted material it is because a firm hired by copyright owners sits in the public swarm logging IPs. They then send a warning to your ISP, who in turn sends you a warning.

    Private trackers are by their nature a club that tries their damnedest to prevent people working for those kind of companies from joining the site to begin with.

    It is still smart to use a VPN but your ISP isn’t generally targeting your data in transit itself. It’s usually a third party company hired out who cannot see your data streams directly. Thus a private tracker reduces the need for such measures since you are less likely to run into a hired hand logging your IP from a private tracker swarm.

    • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      It would be incredibly stupid to still not use a vpn in the states. If a kid who has never tormented before can get an invite to a private tracker, so can a consultant with an antipiracy group. And with a corporate fiber connection and limitless storage budget they could easily sit on thousands of torrents from private sites without having to worry about ratio. The site moderator would never know anything is up until all their users start getting piracy notices, and even then itd be hard to track down the one doing the logging.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Private trackers usually have a limit of active torrents you can have depending on your ratio tier. Sitting on every torrent in a private tracker for one user would be a huge red flag, so the only way to have it work would be to have many accounts. Even then, unless they’re seeding content, they will probably be kicked if their upload is 0 bytes after a month or whatever interval accounts are purged.

        Sure, there are probably some studios going after high profile torrents on private trackers, but thinking they would be monitoring thousands of torrents is a stretch.

        • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Why wouldnt they be seeding? If they own the rights or are acting on behalf of the rightsholders they dont have to worry about the criminality of it, and they have the resources to be in the highest seeding ratio if they want. They could literally build up an account to be the most active seeder on the site and just be collecting logs the whole time until they decide to burn the account and act on all the data they’ve collected.

          • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            If they have the rights to distribute it and can seed it, than what is the crime? I would have to imagine that if a studio wants to limit the spread of pirated material, hiring a firm who will distribute and spread the content the studios are looking to limit is counterproductive. IANAL but i think that if a studio were to take someone to court for piracy and it was discovered that the studio (or a hired firm) was legally providing the content to the defendant, it would be a huge hole in the case, and be grounds for dismissal.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                22 days ago

                but they literally do seed torrents to get a list of all clients who connect to them and download

                Actually, if I recall correctly they tend to seed only partial files because what they actually want to hit people with is distribution. If I understand the legal situation around it correctly, the act of downloading is much harder to pursue in civil court as opposed to damages for distribution. Because they need to prove that you’re not just downloading it for yourself but distributing it to others, hence sitting in the swarm and logging IPs of anyone who sends data to them.