Like, maybe not because of censorship per se, but maybe for abusing their power as an oligopoly or going against the desire of their users?
You must log in or register to comment.
The complaints against their existence go back more than a decade.
But since money is speech, they’ve lobbied against all regulation against them or the creation of public alternatives
if people lost access to something they paid for on Steam or Itch, I would expect a class action lawsuit would be viable, but there would be legal arguments made by Visa and MasterCard that Steam and Itch should be the defendents.
And it would be a good argument, because they wouldn’t be wrong.
The First Amendment is about government censorship. The Bill of Rights is more like a Bill of government restrictions.
So no private company can be held accountable for censorship? That’s pretty messed up.
