I understand your skepticism, but see my other comment on topic RE: TPM 2.0
It’s basically locking down your desktop the same way your phone is locked down (unless you’re one of those nerds running GrapheneOS or the likes, in which case good on ya). Theoretically this could be good in that a totally locked environment is easier to verify and shouldn’t require kernel level anti-cheat anymore. But you know, at the expense of surrendering low level control of your hardware to Microsoft and the likes.
How 'bout no, Scott.
e:
Oh, yes, the famous anti-cheat Secure Boot it’s an hero in the community.
I understand your skepticism, but see my other comment on topic RE: TPM 2.0
It’s basically locking down your desktop the same way your phone is locked down (unless you’re one of those nerds running GrapheneOS or the likes, in which case good on ya). Theoretically this could be good in that a totally locked environment is easier to verify and shouldn’t require kernel level anti-cheat anymore. But you know, at the expense of surrendering low level control of your hardware to Microsoft and the likes.
This is incredibly gross to say the least.