TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前Big Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comexternal-linkmessage-square382fedilinkarrow-up1561arrow-down19
arrow-up1552arrow-down1external-linkBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square382fedilink
minus-squareGeometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 个月前Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
minus-squareTyphoon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·1 个月前Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 个月前That’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
minus-squareIhaveCrabs111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 个月前Not if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-230 天前Increasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs 20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1
Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
That’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
Not if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.
Increasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs
20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1