ardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 天前Google's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for userswww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square262fedilinkarrow-up1540arrow-down112
arrow-up1528arrow-down1external-linkGoogle's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for userswww.androidauthority.comardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 天前message-square262fedilink
minus-squareEggyhead@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·8 天前They never specified who’s security…
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·8 天前Whose* Who’s = who + is Whose = an indication of possession
minus-squareEggyhead@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 天前The question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.
minus-squarek0e3@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 天前I will always remember this grammar rule thanks to the show “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” because I would see that title every morning before school.
minus-squareespentan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 天前Their revenue probably felt very threatened.
They never specified who’s security…
Whose*
Who’s = who + is
Whose = an indication of possession
The question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.
I will always remember this grammar rule thanks to the show “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” because I would see that title every morning before school.
Their revenue probably felt very threatened.