TCB13@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoSystemd Working On "Storage Target Mode" Feature - Inspired By Apple macOSlemmy.worldimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up198arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up195arrow-down1imageSystemd Working On "Storage Target Mode" Feature - Inspired By Apple macOSlemmy.worldTCB13@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareimmibis@social.immibis.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year ago@TCB13 @linux Everything is systemd in the future. This has nothing to do with systemd. It could as well have been called targetdiskd.
minus-squareTCB13@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoYou assessment isn’t entirely correct as this is indeed related to systemd. Read the PR https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29748
minus-squareimmibis@social.immibis.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year ago@TCB13 services aren’t systemd-related just because they are launched by systemd.
minus-squarewinterayars@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoA service by itself shouldn’t be systemd, it should be implemented separately and run under systemd. However, this is using the systemd target subsystem which is a little more specific.
@TCB13 @linux Everything is systemd in the future. This has nothing to do with systemd. It could as well have been called targetdiskd.
You assessment isn’t entirely correct as this is indeed related to systemd. Read the PR https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29748
@TCB13 services aren’t systemd-related just because they are launched by systemd.
A service by itself shouldn’t be systemd, it should be implemented separately and run under systemd. However, this is using the systemd target subsystem which is a little more specific.
Exactly my point. Thanks.