I’ve been seeing this more and more in comments, and it’s got me wondering just how big this issue really is. A lot of people feel trapped in apps like Discord, WhatsApp, and Instagram, but can’t get their friends to leave.

It’s really annoying when you suggest trying something new, whether it’s a different app or just not using these platforms so much but sometimes it can feel like no one wants to go first.

So I’m curious, what apps do you feel most trapped in? And have you tried convincing your friends to leave them? What happened? Is it an issue for you, or are you just going along with the flow?

Looking forward to hearing if this is as common as it feels!

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    As someone whose only apple devices are ipads, the big lockin isn’t imessage vs an SMS client. It’s FaceTime vs, Zoom/GMeet/Jitsi. Mind you, it is nice being able to use iMessage with my wife when I have internet, and then swap over to SMS quickly. Sure, my two devices don’t have a persistent conversation, but her device does.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      FaceTime vs, Zoom/GMeet/Jitsi

      Is the advantage availability among your contacts, or something about the UX?

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Holistically it’s UX.

        If my wife or others in my life who use Apple want to contact me, they don’t have to go into a specific app and hope that I’m looking at it. They can go into iMessage, click the camera, and poof, a video call starts up. The only software I use that does that otherwise is Discord, and that’s not integrated with SMS/MMS. It’s the connection too (which is just as much part of UX) - I’ve had problems with Zoom or others due to connection strength, but not with FaceTime.

        The fact that it’s a “just-works” solution is important.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          they don’t have to go into a specific app and hope that I’m looking at it

          Do the others not ring your phone? I don’t video call often, but when I do it’s usually with Signal, and that definitely rings my phone.

            • Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              4 days ago

              This sounds like a pretty unusual configuration. I don’t imagine most people can be reached more reliably using an app that only runs on their tablet than apps that run on their phone.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You can do the exact same thing with any of hundreds of different messaging apps. The only advantage is that they’re using the same messaging app, because it comes installed by default, you can’t remove it, and they don’t allow you to replace SMS with anything else. If you use an Android phone, it most likely comes with Google Messages pre-installed, which does the exact same thing.

          In other words, it’s nothing to do with “user experience” and everything to do with being in a particular ecosystem.

        • Luke@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Literally all of that UX is the same and better in other apps though.

          For example, every single part of your description applies to video and text conversations with my SO and friends, except we all use Signal. It “just works”, and better than Facetime because it doesn’t matter what device my SO and friends have.

          With Facetime it doesn’t “just work” at all with the large number of people I know who don’t have Apple. That’s a huge disadvantage which means that Facetime UX sucks.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            You just said what they said but the opposite. Both are wrong. Being in the same ecosystem is not UX. It’s not something that anyone can design around.

            • Luke@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              So you don’t consider it an impact on the experience of using a product when it either does or doesn’t function on your device? Sounds like a most basic concept of UX to me, but I dunno what you mean, maybe.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                That’s because you’re taking an extremely literal interpretation. “UX” has to do with design, and as I just mentioned, this isn’t anything to do with design.

                • Luke@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  I’m interpreting the term in the way it’s defined according to Wikipedia:

                  User experience (UX) is how a user interacts with and experiences a product, system or service. It includes a person’s perceptions of utility, ease of use, and efficiency.

                  Facetime being intentionally limited to a single platform absolutely negatively impacts it’s UX by reducing utility, ease of use, and efficiency.