• Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Really you have to outlive 99.9999% of the population to have a chance at surviving as a hunter-gatherer. Industrial agriculture has increased our population well beyond the actual carrying capacity of the land.

    That might not be enough nines. There’s a lot of humans.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Industrial agriculture has increased our population well beyond the actual carrying capacity of the land.

      We could feed everyone on earth with a fraction of the food the world produces, capitalism forces most of it to be thrown out because someone can’t make money from it. Just go look at the dumpsters behind every grocery store, restaurant, etc. - they will be full of food that the store has deemed unsellable.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s another whole kettle of fish, but you are right. And it is sickening when you learn about intentional measures being used by various businesses to prevent dumpster diving/freeganism.

        They don’t just do that with food, by the way…IIRC, the “Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy” doc covered both purposefully ruining food and consumer products…

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, but we couldn’t feed everyone in the world if we had to rely on the natural environment.

        There’s just too many of us and not enough good living areas, so we’re stuck in the trap of agriculture.