• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Pretty cool… But anyone else get major AI vibes from the way this article is written?

    Why even become a journalist anymore if you’re just going to be putting prompts into a black box and copy/pasting the output?

    • beegnyoshi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This article gives me vibes that someone wrote a few lines outlining the situation and asked the AI to write the article itself. Interestingly though, I think most people would just rather read the outline, less time wasted and less llm.

      A part that screams AI would be:

      This wasn’t subtle venue security—your biometric data became part of the artistic statement, whether you consented or not.

      “This isn’t this–it’s that” is an extremely common AI sentence structure, further exposed by the fact that the part before the em-dash doesn’t even make sense to begin with. No one was asking themselves whether it was part of subtle venue security.

      As a sidenote, sometimes I read sentences like this and I wonder “could this ever even have been written by a human?” I think that there’s a very low chance that this article didn’t have at least some amount of AI involved, but I know that somewhere out there there must be some people who actually write like this. And that’s kind of sad.

      tbh I don’t even know why I even wrote this, the entire article appears to be one big example of generic AI writing