cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agoWebplemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square234fedilinkarrow-up1780arrow-down1163 cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1617arrow-down1external-linkWebplemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square234fedilink cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-square𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up66arrow-down2·1 month agoQuality loss? Webp supports lossless.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·1 month agoSo does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
minus-squareMower2560@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoActually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoPractically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.
Quality loss? Webp supports lossless.
So does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
Actually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
Practically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.