• BurningRiver@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    Not only large—huge, and stacked from top to bottom with stuff to do.

    Literally the second sentence in the article, if you’d bother to click on it.

    • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      The problem isn’t that I “couldn’t be bothered.”. The problem is I don’t care to believe such claims until I’ve seen the finished product. Is that better now? Or shall we keep assuming things?

      • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Assume whatever you want. I’m just saying you asked a question that was immediately answered at the very top of the column. They say they scaled up the things to do with the size of the map. I’ve spent hundreds of hours on these games, and I don’t have a reason to doubt that they’d make a map this much larger without adding “things to do”.

        • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I dropped off quickly from the last couple because I didn’t find the things in the map to be all that engaging. Large maps tend to come with the Ubisoft formula of ‘content’ but rarely anything fun, in my experience.