• blave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Wrong

    “Ownership“ doesn’t mean “I can do whatever I want with it”.

    edit: wow, Redditors are better at accepting the truth, lol

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      “Ownership” totally does mean it’s yours and you can do whatever you want with it.

      That means you can do it, not that you should, nor that what you do won’t have consequences.

      It just means your phone won’t stop you from downloading an unapproved app just like a gun won’t stop you from loading an unapproved bullet.

      It means your gun has a safety mechanism you can unlock to shoot, as does your phone to download “unverified” apps.

      It means you can sell either freely to someone else without it becoming bricked or the new owner losing any rights (lookin’ at you, Tesla cars).

      It means defaulting on the loan will require the physical reposession of your phone or gun, and that neither will magically lock you out of using it using telemetry.

      It means anyone with the right knowledge and tools can fix your phone and it’ll work, just like your gun.

      It means your phone works for you, and not for someone else - just like your gun.

      Your phone is a tool. Just like your gun. It can be used for good - and for bad.

      What you do with it is up to you, and not up to it or its manufacturer.

      It means you can shoot people with your gun, just as you can extort and blackmail people with your phone. Nothing, other than your own morality, the morals of society and therule of law are preventing you from doing bad things. Certainly not the will of the manufacturer.

      Any forensic inquiry into a phone on a crime scene would be like that of a gun.

      Any taking of your phone from your home or person would require a warrant - like with a gun.

      Any inquiry into your phone’s contents and qualities should require outside tools - like a similar inquiry into your gun.

      Your phone won’t have a special police-only history of what you’ve used it for - like your gun.

      Your phone won’t report what you’ve been doing with it to 3rd parties without your consent - like won’t your gun.

      And so on.

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I love when newbie accounts think lemmy is reddit. Makes them easier to ignore.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      edit: wow, Redditors are better at accepting the truth, lol

      So go pander to them.

      If I own something, I can do whatever I like with it because it’s mine.

      If I can’t do what I like, it’s not truly mine.

      • blave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        8 hours ago

        you think people who own guns should be allowed to “do whatever they want” with them?

        how many mass shootings do we already have each week?

          • blave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            but the law is the law: just because you own something doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want with it.

            it’s illegal to kill someone with a smartphone, too

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              51 minutes ago

              Right, you can’t break the law. Gun manufacturers are very explicitly not responsible if you break the law with one of the items they manufactured.

              This is more like the gun manufacturer coming back two years after you bought it and preventing you from using bullets from a vendor they don’t approve of.

            • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Except we aren’t talking about the law. We are talking about corporations that sell you something and then retain control over it.

              You have no say in the process, you have no representation. These are not rules that we as a society have determined to be in the best interests of all of us. These are unilateral decisions placed upon us. You have no recourse if you disagree other than don’t use the thing.

              Guns don’t prevent you from doing anything. You still have the capability to do whatever you want with the thing. However, if you use it in a manner than harms someone else, in a way that we as a society have proposed, voted, and created laws prohibiting, then you deal with the consequences. But that is very different from having something in the gun that prevents it from taking ammo from another manufacturer. Or making it unable to shoot unless you pay a monthly fee.

                • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  No. We weren’t. This discussion was about phones and the software we are being allowed to install on them.

                  The law does nothing to restrict us in that capacity. The restrictions are imposed by the manufacturer of the phone.

                  You made the fallacious false equivalency of comparing that with guns and laws.

                • Kissaki@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  What makes you think the ICEBlock app removal is about the law or following the law?

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  The guy you’re replying to celebrated the political assassination of Charlie Kirk, so I wouldn’t bother If I was you.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              If they couldn’t, then they wouldn’t, but they obviously can, because they do. This is not complicated.

                • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  I feel like I am feeding a troll, but let me break this down:

                  If you have a gun, you can point it at anything and pull the trigger, you don’t need the permission of the manufacturer to do so.

                  Not with a phone, you CAN’T load any software you want into your phone.

                  That’s the difference, you can do whatever you want with a gun, and if you mess up, you go to jail. You can’t do whatever you want with your phone, only what the corp.s (apple) allow you to.

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  …you just said it did. That was the initiation of this entire conversation.