• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s objectively a bad thing when a country’s entire economy is being propped up by seven companies and the vast majority of consumer spending is concentrated in the top 1%.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I feel money itself is our new Dutch disease. We live and die according to the flux of money in the global economy/stock markets…

        Are there any theories like that out there? Because money start to no longer function correctly IMO.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The most optimistic take I’ve seen: AI is a drain on the entire economy that sucks up all investment and this is why the rest of the economy is basically in a recession. Once the bubble pops, investors will flood back into the real economy and correct the problem.

      I’m not optimistic.

      • jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ll play devil’s advocate here: agreed that the rest of the (US) economy seems to be slowing or shrinking but remains buoyed by AI / Mag 7 stocks. That said, a lot of the investment reflected above is in data centers and hardware (Nvidia, Coreweave, Oracle, Microsoft).

        The bubble pop will hinge on whether there is value in this data center buildup beyond AI. Unless everyone starts paying fistfulls of cash for AI chat, these companies may be able to find another use for all that compute and avoid a total crash. That could be a target for all that investment you mention.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The way to make a big dent in that is to tax unused housing, with peogressivwly increasing amounts as they continue unoccupied. And limit or outright deny ownership by companies and investment firms.

          We have more than enough housing for everyone, but a large portion of it sits unused. In many cases only because no one will/can pay what some of these companies are demanding monthly for them.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Specially when those companies are valued in TRILLIONS. Nothing is worth trillions, somehow these surreal numbers have been accepted as hard fact.

      • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Nothing is worth trillions,

        There is things worth trillions. Like full countries, and the largest pension funds and social security funds. Having a single company be comparable to those massive collections of people is insane, and it’s because they think it can replace workers–when it can’t, not yet, and not for a long time

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Evaluations of everything is crazy. Net worth of celebrities with make up lines in particular is crazy. Look how many celebs are worth a billion dollars. To be worth that much, they should be selling at least $50 millions a year of product with no prediction of winding down.