Bacon and ham sold in the UK should carry cigarette-style labels warning that chemicals in them cause bowel cancer, scientists say.

Their demand comes as they criticise successive British governments for doing “virtually nothing” to reduce the risk from nitrites in the decade since they were found to definitely cause cancer.

Saturday marks a decade since the World Health Organization in October 2015 declared processed meat declared processed meat to be carcinogenic to humans, putting it in the same category as tobacco and asbestos.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It really needs to specify the carcinogens and what they’re used as. There’s a huge difference between “this product uses a 30% lead solder in internal components” and “adhesives used in this product may offgas formaldehyde”

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, that could also provide an incentive for companies to produce stuff in ways that reduce carcinogens, yet still have some amount. I think traditional bacon that doesn’t use synthetic curing salts contain less nitrates, for example.

      • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Lmao a carcinogen tier list would unironically be fantastic because it would help me gauge the relative risk.

        I just feel like putting evering into one big bucket is lazy as fuck and doesn’t really help anyone.

    • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yes!! Thank you for getting it. I have no issues with labeling carcinogens but we really need to distinguish between agents that are harmful at the ppm and the ppb levels.

      There’s an entire axis that differs by orders of magnitude that is being ignored and it’s incredibly detrimental to the whole system.

      This list sucks because it lacks meaningful information and is just eventually going to be a list of every compound in the known universe.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        There’s magnitude and that’s important but the big thing about what, where, how is that it tells me how to protect myself and others from it. If my metal shim is an alloy containing lead, I need to wash my hands after touching it, use breathing protection and air filtration if I grind it, and cover it in the final version of the product. If it’s made in a facility that also processes lead, I can just wash it and it’ll be fine. If it may contain trace lead from ore deposits I don’t have to care. Meanwhile internal components that don’t offgas just means I’m fine if I don’t open it up

        • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Exactly, just slapping a “warning cancer” label on literally everything does absolutely nothing to help me actually protect myself.