jankforlife@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 22 hours agoThOSe DArN TAnKIeS!!!lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down129
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkThOSe DArN TAnKIeS!!!lemmy.mljankforlife@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 22 hours agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squaremeekah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down13·edit-213 hours agoEquating police with literal tanks… Alright Guess I should have specified excessive force. Tbf, police also has a problem with that, but that’s a different story.
minus-squareKimBongUn420@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down5·13 hours agoAh so you’re fine with armored police vehicles as long as they’re not called tanks… alright
minus-squaremeekah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down5·12 hours ago Tbf, police also has a problem with that, but that’s a different story. What part of that did you not understand?
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down6·12 hours ago Equating police with literal tanks… Alright You were the one who said “force”, asshole, you didn’t say anything about tanks specifically, or why the specific type of vehicle used would matter. Guess I should have specified excessive force Good news! Nobody ever considers the force used by the governments they support to be excessive.
minus-squaremeekah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down10·12 hours agolmao you really think you’re arguing in good faith here? Coming in with an ad hominem right out of the gate, and then completely ignoring an entire third of my comment. not gonna convince anyone of anything this way. touch some grass.
minus-squaremeekah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down10·12 hours ago Insulting you is not an ad-hominem it literally is, lol
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·7 hours agoAd hominem, ad personam, who cares. The point is that calling your interlocutor “dumb fuck” does not enrich the discussion, nor the readers.
Equating police with literal tanks… Alright
Guess I should have specified excessive force. Tbf, police also has a problem with that, but that’s a different story.
Ah so you’re fine with armored police vehicles as long as they’re not called tanks… alright
What part of that did you not understand?
You were the one who said “force”, asshole, you didn’t say anything about tanks specifically, or why the specific type of vehicle used would matter.
Good news! Nobody ever considers the force used by the governments they support to be excessive.
lmao you really think you’re arguing in good faith here? Coming in with an ad hominem right out of the gate, and then completely ignoring an entire third of my comment.
not gonna convince anyone of anything this way. touch some grass.
Removed by mod
it literally is, lol
Nope
Removed by mod
Ad hominem, ad personam, who cares. The point is that calling your interlocutor “dumb fuck” does not enrich the discussion, nor the readers.