- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
In an unmarked envelope of cash. Just like business insider’s article shows.
At least Ireland is doing some good shit in this hellhole of a world
doubt it will ever actually happen, our goverment sucks and hates us
Sounds familiar
Even the soviets checked if the art was any good first.
Them not really checking anything is the best part of than my opinion, because then anyone can have a basic income for trying to culturally improving themselves.
This is such a great win.And who decides what “good” art is? That’s completely subjective!
Also basic income should be universal, instead of restricting it more.
If someone wants to live as a failed artist on basic income: let them. Perhaps they even find an art form that they like if they have enough time to figure it out.
It would be very interesting if any other income were prohibited under threat of imprisonment. It would be a good experiment.
That’s not what Basic Income is for. Basic income is meant to cover your basics for survival, a safety net. If you want any additional money you’re meant to still work for it. It’s not a replacement for employment.
I have a pretty good idea of what UBI is. But in this context, we are talking about people in the arts; they shouldn’t be employed somewhere, so that they can devote themselves entirely to creating art.
Do you mean income from sources other than their art? Or any income at all?
Any income at all. It would make everything easier and more fun.
What would be fun about restricting people to 1500 a month because they choose to pursue art?
That can be the most significant and big happening of last decades. And of course it’s fun.
You’re not a good person
What makes you think that?
Is this qrstuv’s alt lmao
