As details of the death toll for January’s protests continue to emerge, three students explain why they are resisting a return to normality

More than 45 days after a brutal January crackdown that left thousands of Iranian protesters dead, students across several universities are protesting again. As Iran’s new academic term began on Saturday, students in Tehran gathered on campus, chanting anti-government slogans, despite a heavy security presence and plainclothes officers stationed outside university gates.

The Guardian spoke to protesting students about why they were rallying despite the fact that thousands had been killed and tens of thousands arrested in the January demonstrations.

“Our classrooms are empty because the graveyards are full,” said Hossein*, 21, a student at the University of Tehran. “It’s for them – our friends, classmates and compatriots, who were gunned down in front of our eyes, that we decided to boycott the classes.”

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why is it the responsibility of the US? I’m old enough to remember being (rightfully) shunned for doing the same fucking shit in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why did the US invade Afghanistan? Why did they invade Iraq?

        Do you believe the US is considering a ground invasion of Iran?

        (ps I don’t advocate it’s their responsibility, mainly arguing about opposing any intervention)

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          because of lies and oil as always. there wasnt any us intervention in the middle east in history that left the country better. evil fucking empire.

          • perestroika@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Please don’t lump Afghanistan and Iraq together.

            Afghanistan had no oil. The US invaded because it was attacked by a group based in Afghanistan. The end was a mess, but the invasion was justified. This has been the only time NATO article 5 has been activated, by the way.

            Iraq has oil. The US has invaded twice. Once because the UN authorized restoring the independence of Kuwait, after Iraq had invaded Kuwait. The second time because emperor Bush II lied to everyone about weapons of mass destruction. The end was a mess, of course.

            Does this have any predictive value for Iran?

            I can only tell this:

            • I see no preparations for a land war
            • regimes may sometimes fall after suffering a military defeat
            • only one regime has fallen recently because of an air intervention (Gaddafi in Libya, but the Libyan civil war had already started at this time)

            As a result, I am not convinced of any outcome, I do not support and do not oppose, I observe and try to understand.

            • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              group based in Afghanistan

              bankrolled by the US to further their nefarious interests in the region. when they turned against the empire by attacking the wtc, the us responded by… genociding it’s people.

              none of this was justified at all.

              • perestroika@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                bankrolled by the US to further their nefarious interests in the region.

                A long time ago. In response to the USSR couping and occupying Afghanistan. Which was, of course, also not justified.

                If Afghanistan had been left alone, things would very likely be better in several countries…

                • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  the us funded terrorists in the region to destabilize it so socialism didn’t succeed. it had nothing to do with the now-obvious “protecting democracy” excuse, as always with us imperialism worldwide, tbh. i mean it’s no wonder the us is so hated in the global south.

                  A long time ago

                  not a long time. the us funded al qaeda until the early 90s. their retribution came barely a decade later. an entire country then suffered for it.

                  the us wouldn’t have as much influence in the region (and so much free reign for genocide) if they had left afghans alone.

            • Riverside@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              By not subjecting them to criminal economics mic sanctions, which are known to murder more than half a million people yearly?

              • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Why not use sanctions? What universal law is there that we cannot, under any circumstances, block economic interaction? Governments unable to block trade might be the ultimate capitalist dream but there’s no reason sane people should be forced into it.

                • Riverside@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  What part of “US sanctions murder half a million people yearly” do you not understand or care about?

                  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    For starters: the absolute vagueness of it

                    Say that I’m doing some genocides and you decide you don’t want to trade with me anymore because of it. If that means I run out of money and my baby starves, would you have remorse?

                    (This is a simplified allegory of the situation, but I hope you care enough about the world to understand the comparison)

            • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              by keeping your grubby arrogant hands off of it and stop lying about it. huge improvement already.

            • freagle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              We don’t. Stop being a chauvinist. The Iranian people, together, improve things for themselves. Our responsibility is to dismantle the Western imperialist machine that has killed almost 40 million people in the last 50 years through sanctions alone

                • freagle@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Because you don’t live in Iran and it’s not your responsibility. Your responsibility, depending on where you live, is to dismantle the closest link to you in the chains that hold the world in imperial bondage, which is the Western machine helmed by the USA.

        • freagle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          So you’re arguing that some interventions by the US that led to hundreds of thousands or millions of civilian deaths, long-term cancer and birth defects, total destruction of civilian infrastructure, and decades of neocolonial extraction are somehow justifiable?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As an American I’ve long supported assisting rebels, but going to war is just as likely to backfire as it is to succeed.

      • Riverside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        As an American I’ve long supported assisting rebels

        The best way to support Iranians would be to mass-protest against the US-imposed economic sanctions demolishing their economy. US economic sanctions murder half a million people yearly, per latest medical studies.

      • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well you can give the small arms but then they’re up against an advanced military. They basically don’t stand a chance without at least air support

        If you let them get nukes it’s basically game over

        • freagle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          The US does that when it wants to create a civil war where previously there was no civil war. Civil wars are great for neocolonial intervention. You pump arms into the weaker side. They start killing. The whole defense complex now has to manage its existing counter-intelligence program against the US but now they also have an active hot conflict domestically. Lots of military-capable people die. Then the neocolonial empire comes in once the chaos has weakened everyone and they save the day!

          • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s no civil war because the Iranian regime kills everyone that poses a threat. People are taking to the streets to demand basic rights and they get shot in the head by the thousands.

            How do you suggest the Iranian people get out of this situation?

            • freagle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              By coming together with their government to defeat the imperialists?

                • freagle@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Find and expose the foreign spies operating in Iran, continue to advocate on the world stage for the end to the crimes against humanity that are the collective punishment of sanctions, and engage in mutual aid to reduce the suffering caused by the crimes against humanity that are the collective punishment of sanctions.

                  What they shouldn’t do is align their interests with the US and Israel for the violent overthrow of the anti-imperialist Iranian government.

                  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Yeah but what if you want to help your government to ‘expose the spies’ and they tell you to go hang some gays first? Do you side with teh empire or hang the gays?