The Chrome team says they’re not going to pursue Web Integrity but…

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team “heard your feedback.” I’m sure that’s true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

  • TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    I absolutely do not trust Chrome or the google team. It does not make me feel any better the only barrier to them trying to ruin a internet a bit is some backlash.

  • dirtbiker509@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d like to believe that enough of us actually stopped using chrome and switched to Firefox the day they made that announcement that swayed them… But in reality I’m sure it was just the bad press and they’re going to try to find a different more sneaky way to do the same shit.

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      To be fair I still think Google services, Microsoft, etc and all that jazz is great, I’m no corporate shill or some free software nutter, but the issue however is the consistent anticompetitive strategies and vendor lock-in used to compensate for a lack of innovation.

      Imagine if you could, for about a month, up to a year long period, where you just use a de-googled phone, a live USB and a portable hard drive, you’ll actually have a different perspective and appreciation for what works with computers, printers, etc and our use of technology as a whole

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Can you actually stop using chrome on android? Because every link I click it opens in their webview app which is chrome

      • dirtbiker509@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah there is a setting and now when I click links it opens in Firefox. But if you use the Google search widget it still opens in chrome, which is to be expected I guess.

        • Calavera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s not only a problem for google search, most apps uses webview to handle web links. They can do like Voyager and have a option to open the default browser instead, but most of them don’t bother with that.

      • flamingarms@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Dunno if this is what you mean, but you can definitely set another browser as default. Any context menus will change too: “Open with Firefox”, or w/e you’re using.

        • Calavera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, I’m not talking about default browser but the WebView app. For example I’m using Voyager for Lemmy, and if I click on this post’s link it will open the website in the WebView, then I can click to Open with firefox.

          But WebView itself is still chrome as you can see

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s even crazier than that. On some versions of Android there is no webview, only chrome! I think that was around Android 8 or so they dropped webview then re-added webview in the next version

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Advert People are easily startled, but they’ll soon be back, and in greater numbers.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    They’re just starting it smaller scale. Within a year it’ll be pushed out to everyone broadly.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      They get the permissions for the little thing that is worded vaguely enough to them funnel people into the larger thing

    • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is literally going to be what they did for FLoC. Basically release it as topics.

      Google absolutely cannot stop tracking everyone at this point. I’m pretty sure they’ve put the entire house on the bet to track people more and do everything to ensure that Google Chrome tracks every aspect of your web browsing experience.

      So while WEI is dead, I think Google’s boat is so far out to sea now that it’s either try this again a bit more gently or watch the ship sink. Everyone said FLoC was dead and they absolutely put it into the web browser with Topics. Nothing convinces me this is any different, they are absolutely going to, and I dare say have an existential need to, put this shit in everyone’s browser.

  • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    The “don’t be evil” motto was replaced with “don’t be evil, but greedy and posessive is okay”

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have not followed this stuff very closely. Here’s a question. This article says:

    People took issue with how the Web Integrity API would bring DRM to the open web.

    Has there not been DRM on the web for many years by now for videos?

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      This would bring DRM to everything on the internet. If you wanted to get grandma’s apple brown betty recipe even the text would be unavailable unless your browser and the page agree that it should happen. And the browser wouldn’t give the OK unless the page is advertiser friendly, and the page won’t give the greenlight if you’ve blocked any ads recently.

    • SeriousBug@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is worse. Let’s go with an example: on an Android phone, you visit a website. The website asks for an integrity check, the browser works with Google Play Services to complete the check.

      What if you have a de-Googled phone without Play Services, or if you made modifications to restrict Google’s tracking? Then Google can refuse to verify you. What if you installed an ad blocker in your browser? Google can refuse to verify you.

      If you fail verification, the website could ask you to complete a captcha, or just refuse to show you anything.

  • cannache@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    One set of standards for the internet systems, and multiple measurements and methods I say, hardly makes sense to split the whole web to pieces over advertising money, especially when access to knowledge, strength, capability to invent and discover of all sorts is now at such an all time high.

    We’ve yet to build anything on the moon or create livable spaces in outer space

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah gotta wait for the heat on this antitrust probe to die down before doing the dirty.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That’s the problem. They could have made it a requirement for a site to work in Chrome. And since Chrome has such a majority sites would have to comply. Then the other browsers would have to fall in line or just stop working with most websites. Google’s monopoly is complete enough that they can dictate how the web works. You need to both care what chrome does and care that other people are still using it or you’re just as fucked as they are.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    K, I’m still not using Google search engine anymore. And once I find a replacement for any other Google services and devices I have, it’s out with those as well.