He called the ruling a “huge win” over a “horrible gerrymander.” But Trump himself has ordered many GOP states to gerrymander maximally. So here Trump openly declared that Republicans reserve the right to rig elections while Democrats do not. His actual position is that Republicans should play by their own corrupt rules, a declaration of intent to functionally steal the midterms.

    • panthera_@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The US government should have companies bid on a program to draw congressional districts. All states would be required to use the winning program. The winning program would be subject to peer review. Ask your computer programming friend how such a program would be used for gerrymandering.

      • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        The point is, the program doesn’t solve the problem. In your statement, the peer review of the program may solve the problem. Now, who picks the members for the peer review group? The same people who pick the congressional district committee? How does that solve the issue of bias in the committee? At best, the only thing this does is make them write out the criteria for districts, but code can be written to be obtuse, too.

        • panthera_@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Those doing the peer review would be university professors of computer science randomly chosen from top universities.

          • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            So we’re back to legislation and regulations picking people who we have to trust. Which is how it will always end.

            • panthera_@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              How would a professor of computer science cheat? Remember there would be many other professors reviewing it.

              • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 days ago

                They would cheat the same way any other committee would cheat. They would dismiss the biases they’re in favor of and highlight the biases they’re against. Or are you just assuming professors are completely objective and are paragons of virtue?

                • panthera_@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  The computer program will be based on mathematics. Mathematics is not biased. Suppose someone wanted to divide a large piece of land into lots of equal sizes. How would the calculation be biased?

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          The problem is not really the code. It is writing the specification of what the code should do. What properties the drawn districts should have. Anyone can then run the program and confirm that the results match the spec.

          Hell, with a good spec, you can just vibe code that thing.