He called the ruling a “huge win” over a “horrible gerrymander.” But Trump himself has ordered many GOP states to gerrymander maximally. So here Trump openly declared that Republicans reserve the right to rig elections while Democrats do not. His actual position is that Republicans should play by their own corrupt rules, a declaration of intent to functionally steal the midterms.
Incorrect. A district should represent the views of people in that district. A district is not drawn to represent specific views. A computer program will draw districts based on population size, each district having the same number of people. It will not and should not be based on the beliefs of people.
Then what is the purpose of gerrymandering? It doesn’t require some especially larger or smaller districts, by population, yet it can move seats from one party to another. How can this happen if drawing the district lines in one place rather than another doesn’t enhance or diminish the vote of some subset of the members in a district?
Again, this subject is far more complex than you seem to grasp. This isn’t something that is going to be fixed by the beauty of math or the impartiality of a computer program (both of which are things I deeply appreciate).
It will affect the voting power of various interests, but the computer program will be impartial. That’s what voters will appreciate. It’s like losing a game. If it’s fair, the fans accept it.
Put out a bid and let’s see what the bidding companies can create.