YouTube is increasing Premium prices in multiple countries, right after an ad-blocker crackdown | You either pay rightfully for the video content you consume, or you live with the ads.::Google is increasing the prices of YouTube Premium and YouTube Music Premium subscriptions in some regions, right after blocking ad-blockers.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Kinda glad my uBlock Origin is still working.

    This should be illegal, actually in Europe it’s about to be…

    • sergih@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      what is illegal? Havinadblockcks, cracking down onadblocks or upping the price on the software after ““forcing”” people to move to it.

  • Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    A few months ago I was thinking about getting YouTube premium. It’s a platform I’m on everyday and have been using it for years. But they decided to block adblockers and increase prices, so they can go fuck themselves.

    • 99nights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m on the go fuck yourselves side even though I use YT everyday quite a lot.

      Us Aussies got it hard, price went up from 18 to 33. I’m strongly considering this to be my last month.

  • zingo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The way Google is starting to abuse its position of power to crackdown on its users, its really comes to show the cracks in its armour.

    It’s the beginning of the end for Google.

    Long live open source software!

    • Debs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If we are going to do this capitalist market thing than we need competition.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Aww. Are the greedy megacorporations upset that consumers are being greedy in return? Poor megacorporations. :c

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I pay for YouTube because I leave it on basically all day. It’s worth the 14ish(I don’t remember) a month. I just wish more of my pay would go to the creators.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you’re happy with the service then I hope it remains a good cost for you, to me it costs too much for what I would actually want it for.

  • ropegirth@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’ve already calculated, how high and in how many increments, they can rise their prices, while still coming out ahead. For every country specifically.

  • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, no… it’s already overpriced.

    Paramount + £6.99 Netflix £10.99 (standard) Youtube £12

    Makes no sense… they don’t have anything like the production overheads. Stuff like Star Trek and Stranger Things are expensive. ‘10 greatest cat videos’ is not.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Heck, they don’t even pay a good fraction of their bandwidth because they put caching box in your ISP location to reduce loads. This is a huge privilege as ISPs won’t let any random companies run equipments for free in their network, which is one of a huge barrier for any YouTube competitors.

      • LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They might be allowing them to run the boxes for free, but the ISPs are saving money on bandwidth, too.

        Get enough users for the ISP to care and they’ll work with you. Otherwise, you probably don’t have all that many users to begin with, so the overhead that maintaining and distributing these boxes would create wouldn’t be worth it anyway.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It “makes sense” in that, unlike those two, YT has to deal with thousands of hours of video being uploaded to their servers every minute. What they don’t pay in streaming rights, they pay in storage and bandwidth costs, plus a couple of peanuts for “moderation”, which is probably more expensive in the long run

      • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I can’t see the value in using youtube for music… it’s not like I can watch music videos in my car. That’s worth $0 to me, and I imagine the majority. Spotify is better… or apple music if you’re on the fruit side.

        • ChronosWing@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Youtube music doesn’t have music videos, not sure what you are talking about. It’s just a clone of play music after they shut it down.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unpopular opinion: this is a good thing.

    (Waits for down votes… )

    This is healthy for the ecosystem, it makes it possible for other video platforms to compete, and be sustainable. Google providing the loss leader in video streaming makes it difficult for other platforms to exist, and sustain themselves, because they don’t have Google’s war chest.

    So it’s going to be a difficult transition, but now there is wiggle room for other platforms to exist. And with 1 gigabit, and 10 gigabit home internet connections becoming more common globally, we have options for more interesting gorilla distributed video streaming.

      • Kazumara@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        64.75 Swiss Franks per month from my ISP, it’s the same price as their 1 Gb/s and 25 Gb/s plans.

        I’m currently still on 1Gb/s because buying the faster router, switch and network cards to make use of more is kind of expensive

        • Sparrow_1029@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Wow that’s nice! I get 600/25mbps for $80USD in the US, coax 😞 wish fiber-to-the-premise was a possibility in my neighborhood

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Even that’s twice what I get. The prices here are disgusting… I get 300mbps for $100… Yay monopolies!