mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down12
arrow-up1378arrow-down1external-linkFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down30·6 months agoThe things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either
minus-squareKraiden@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·6 months agoNet neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·6 months agoIf it was the status quo then why have rules?
minus-squareShepherdPie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·6 months agoThen it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·6 months agoBut there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.
The things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either
Net neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything
If it was the status quo then why have rules?
Then it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?
But there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.