mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down12
arrow-up1378arrow-down1external-linkFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square32linkfedilink
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down30·2 years agoThe things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either
minus-squareKraiden@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·2 years agoNet neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·2 years agoIf it was the status quo then why have rules?
minus-squareShepherdPie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 years agoThen it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·2 years agoBut there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.
The things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either
Net neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything
If it was the status quo then why have rules?
Then it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?
But there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.