• SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This just sounds like a bad idea, a solution in search of a problem. Sure, sudo is a setuid binary, but it’s a fairly simple program, and at some point, you have to trust the code. It’s also a very fundamental piece of the system that you want to always work, even (especially!) when other things get borked. The brief description of run0 already has too many potential points of failure.

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      sudo isn’t simple at all. SUID binaries shouldn’t be LDAP clients, IMO. Unfortunate bugs like “user environment variables are used to select the editor” make all the complex configuration a huge risk, because permitting a single user to edit a single file suddenly gives the user full root access when they set the right env variables.

      I have no specific love for run0 (doas works just as well) but sudo does way more than it should do in a binary with the SUID bit.

      run0 doesn’t exist because systemd wanted to build their own sudo, they just realised their systemd-run already offers most sudo features so they may as well make them available to end users.