• credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    To that end, this means we would need to lower standards, use some forced labor, and increase taxes to increase subsidies in order to compete.

    Republicans would shoot down the subsidies.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      No it literally wouldn’t. It’s absolutely possible to produce smaller lightweight vehicles with the exact same standards. But unfortunately we’ve all been pushed towards larger vehicles. Simply because they make more money on them.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The push towards large vehicles was due to the fact that they used a truck chassis, and were exempt from safety and emissions requirements of a “car”

      • andrewth09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unfortunately producing a smaller affordable car for the average person would fall under “lower standards” 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

      • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It doesn’t matter what size car Americans build, they simply can’t compete. Larger vehicles are a cultural preference and fits the American environment.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If this was true, the Chinese EVs could be allowed in and no one would buy them. I personally want a smaller car that can comfortably seat 5 and has additional safety and comfort features (backup cameras, lane assist, heat pump climate control, etc.). This could easily be done with a sedan, hatchback, or station wagon. The only cars that have these features that I know of are SUVs.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not exactly true when they’re selling them for $10k-$15k. The Bolt is comparable to a Chinese EV and they only sell around 2k per month while something like the Model 3 sells 50k per month.

            If you lowered the price of the Bolt to the price of a 10 year old used Camry, I’m sure it would sell a lot better but this is an artificial price that completely distorts the market and puts a lot of people out of work for what amounts to a temporary savings. This is the whole point of tariffs. They level the playing field for everyone.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just producing EV versions of Honda Fit or Ford Fiesta like what the Chinese EV makers do is enough. Instead, they keep producing EVs with luxury features (and high price tags) then surprised people won’t buy them without subsidy.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The Bolt isn’t cheap though (almost 2x of Honda Fit price), and wasn’t produced in sufficient quantity. The Chinese EV companies are somehow able to produce entry level EV models with minimal features at a price cheaper than Honda Fit and they’re selling like hot cakes both domestically and in neighboring Asian countries.