• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Debian maintainer is probably a volunteer. Can we not troll people who make Debian and Foss possible?

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            If by issues you mean looking out for people’s privacy sure, someone has to.

            • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              by issues I mean breaking existing users’ workflow, possibly literally locking them out (I personally use a yubikey with my keepass db, for example).

              There is a very simple solution he could have done: not rename the existing package. Just give his fork a new name. That’s it, everybody is happy.

              So yes, he is the one causing issues. Because the issue isn’t in the features he removed, but by breaking the users’expectation that the package they installed yesterday, is the same one they’re updating today.

    • federalreverse-old@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You have a point to some degree, yet I still think it is defensible to make this post. He majorly altered software

      • downstream
      • against user expectations
      • for somewhat spurious reasons
      • seemingly quite ad-hoc

      He then went on to defend that decision in a less-than-graceful way before announcing there will be a second, new package.

      But, to make it clear: I certainly don’t approve of hate directed toward him and I don’t have a personal issue with him.