• Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok yes I can follow that. The cynical thing is that in none of the reasons the Palestinian people are central. Those are victimized by both the Israelis and Hamas, following this rationale.

    An extra cynical level is that the wished of the extreme right Israelis and Hamas are the same. To keep this war going indefinitely, not matter the cost of human life.

    In what kind of setting would this be proposed? ‘listen we might invite genocidal terror on our own people, but Russia needs some radio silence and we crave media attention’ and everyone involved going like ‘that’s absolutely worth it brother’.

    Maybe I’m too naive, I cannot see the tactical gain in that perspective. Thanks though, for good counter points. It helps me trying to make some kind of sense of this.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I know Machiavelli, I don’t remember suicidal tactics, though, and certainly not playing according to ones worst enemies playbook.

        But mass media wasn’t around in the Renaissance…

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The whole philosophy is how to get the outcomes you want, any means are justified.

          Saying person X is playing into person Ys playbook is making huge assumptions about their goals.

          We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

            And I thank you for that exposition, however cynical it does give some reason to what appears madness.

            But if it comes to serving the people of Palestine they aren’t really doing that, rather the opposite.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Hamas is not working in the best interest of Palestine civilians, they are working in the best interest of Hamas - Which is a fascist theocratic military organization with goals of ethnic cleansing.

              The only issue at question is why did the Gazan people feel that Hamas was their best option in 2006 when they were elected into office? I don’t really know, I can speculate that the hopeless turn to extreme religious war mongers for even the promise of a better future, or failing that the promise of a fight as they are erased from history… some people, when they have no hope, will hold on to revenge.

              Since 2006, and the failed coup in 2007, Hamas hasn’t held any elections and runs as a dictatorship.