• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a stupid argument against solar power, but it is a legitimate argument against cheap and poorly-constructed solar panels that do not have the same longevity as the ones built in the 90s.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The one’s made now have plenty of longevity. They don’t base the replacement time on when they actually go bad, and as long as they’re not abused or get hit by bowling ball-sized hail or something, they’ll keep producing some kind of power for a long time. It’s just that for the space they take up, it may be worthwhile to replace them.

      Same with EV batteries. They might have limited range after 10 years, but they could still be useful for things like home backup power without having to do a whole recycling job.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is there a problem with the market being flooded with cheap not very good solar panels? Every single panel I looked at to put on my roof have all been of the highest quality I’ve not seen anyone try and hawk anything substandard.

      Unless of course they’re lying about what panels they’re using but realistically I can’t see that lasting for very long.