• Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
        5·
        6 months ago

        Sure, I should have gone further.

        Systemd/GNU libc/GNU Coreutils/GNU BASH/Linux/X11//GTK/GNOME
        Systemd/GNU libc/GNU Coreutils/GNU BASH/Linux/X11/GTK/LXDE
        Systemd/GNU libc/GNU Coreutils/Zsh/Linux/X11/GTK/GNOME
        Systemd/GNU libc/GNU Coreutils/Zsh/Linux/X11/GTK/LXDE
        SysVInit/musl/Busybox/tcsh/Linux/csh
        Systemd/GNU libc/GNU Coreutils/Zsh/Linux/Wayland/QT/KDE Plasma
        Systemd/GNU libc/GNU Coreutils/Zsh/Linux/Wayland/QT/LXQT

        etc, etc.

        There are thousands of combinations of the possible layers needed to make an OS.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
          4·
          6 months ago

          the thing is that not all of them use systemd or bash or zsh or even X11 (servers don’t usually have X11 installed)

          All of them use a Linux kernel and many components that were originally developed for GNU, especially the C library.

          • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
            5·
            6 months ago

            Yes, I listed sysvinit for that reason. And Musl instead of glibc. GNU is optional in a Linux distro, except for the kernel’s use of a GNU license.

          • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
            2·
            6 months ago

            Except Alpine & those based on it, which uses Linux but not GNU libc or GNU coreutils or GNU BASH… Just musl libc & Busybox. I.e. the entire subject of this thread is one of the non-GNU Linuxes.