NightOwl@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoJapan navy destroyer enters Chinese waters near Taiwan, prompting Beijing complaintwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkJapan navy destroyer enters Chinese waters near Taiwan, prompting Beijing complaintwww.reuters.comNightOwl@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarecarl_marks[use name]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoTaiwan is internationally recognized by ~13 states and the UK is not one or them (Reuters HQ). Taiwan is part of China, which is recognized by the UK, therefore the headline is correct…
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoTurns out the headline is correct, but not because of anything to do with recognizing Taiwan. The ship sailed within 12 miles of the Chinese Mainland.
minus-squarecarl_marks[use name]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoIt would’ve been correct either way
minus-squarecarl_marks[use name]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoIt was you that initially “corrected” the headline
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months ago… and if it was Taiwanese waters instead of mainland China’s that were breached, I could maybe be bothered to continue to argue with you. Yeah, upon reading the article I conceded the arguement vs the headline. Doesn’t mean I have to continue responding to you. Bye now.
Taiwan is internationally recognized by ~13 states and the UK is not one or them (Reuters HQ). Taiwan is part of China, which is recognized by the UK, therefore the headline is correct…
Turns out the headline is correct, but not because of anything to do with recognizing Taiwan. The ship sailed within 12 miles of the Chinese Mainland.
It would’ve been correct either way
no one cares
It was you that initially “corrected” the headline
… and if it was Taiwanese waters instead of mainland China’s that were breached, I could maybe be bothered to continue to argue with you.
Yeah, upon reading the article I conceded the arguement vs the headline. Doesn’t mean I have to continue responding to you. Bye now.