germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoMarket shar(ul)elemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square213fedilinkarrow-up11.46Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.46Karrow-down1imageMarket shar(ul)elemmy.blahaj.zonegermanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square213fedilink
minus-squareLime66@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoAndroid uses linux code though, how do they get away with licensing under apache
minus-squareSanyanov@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoGPL is one-way compatible with Apache - that is, you can license programs made with GPL code under Apache, the latter being open-source, even though permissive.
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year ago you can license programs made with GPL code under Apache No, it’s the other way around. The GPL doesn’t allow you to remove the user protections.
Android uses linux code though, how do they get away with licensing under apache
GPL is one-way compatible with Apache - that is, you can license programs made with GPL code under Apache, the latter being open-source, even though permissive.
No, it’s the other way around. The GPL doesn’t allow you to remove the user protections.
Thanks, my bad!