YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    New article title. YouTube tests more ways of making their service shit and driving away users.

    Edit: TIFO Scott Manley is on Odysee so i will start watching him there instead. One less yt channel is always a good thing

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, if you’re not paying for it, and they can’t advertise to you, what do they need you for?

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        To keep claiming they have x billion accounts…

        There’s a big reason why these companies don’t remove the bots and willingly allow them to do whatever. It boosts their numbers to inflate their actual worth.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        at least on my part, what they get from channel memberships (a whopping 30%) I’m sure exceeds the amount in ad revenue they lose from me

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Does YouTube have competition? Your line of inquiry doesn’t mean much if the content is only on YouTube.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not sure what point you think you’re making.

          YouTube doesn’t want you visiting if they can’t either put ads in front of you or get you to subscribe to premium. I appreciate wanting to access YouTube without ads, but from where they’re sitting, if they scare you off with server side ads all the better.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Simply put: why care about their point of view? Google does not have your best interests in mind, often the opposite. There’s no where else to get almost all of the content, why do without or waste time with ads in this short life.

            • Wogi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              YouTube could fall off the face of the earth and I would probably see my quality of life improve slightly.

              I don’t give a shit about Google. Perspective here is important when you threaten to leave the platform all together, as if they would care. If you’re one of the users they gain no ad revenue or subscription revenue from, they’re probably happy to see you go.

              Could they be doing more to try to turn Adblock users in to paid subscribers? Sure. I’m not here to defend their methods. I’m just saying that if you’re not paying, and you can’t be served ads, they really don’t care if you continue to use the service or not.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I did pay for it but they massively increased the price while the recommendation algorithm was deliberately made worse and they wouldn’t stop pushing short format videos.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Youtube is google No 1 source of machine learning content. Fuckloads of video, audio and subtitle data they can use to feed and train their systems. Youtube itself doesnt need to make profit, thats just a bonus for them.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          YouTube advertising is more than 10% of Google services total profits.

          That’s not a bonus, that’s a dependant revenue stream.

          • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah no, that is revenue. Youtube is 10% of total Google/Alphabet revenue. That doesnt necessarily equate to 10% of profits.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      YouTube: oh no, the freeloaders costing us money are going away, what will we ever do!?