• Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, but each package manager has it’s (dis-)advantages. It’s great to have flatpak and docker to be able to run software on almost all distros, but the OS still needs a way to update.

    Almost all immutable distros use multiple package manager.

    • Fedora Silverblue: rpm-ostree + flatpak (+ toolbox)
    • OpenSUSE MicroOS: zypper with snapshots (transactional-update) + flatpak (+ distrobox)
    • NixOS is unique since it only uses the Nix package manager
    • immutable Ubuntu will probably only use snap for OS + apps.

    All those OS support distrobox and docker additionally.

    • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      NixOS is unique because it uses the only potent package manager (if we don’t count that one reimplementation of Nix). Calling the others “package managers” becomes mostly a courtesy when NixOS enters the picture.

      lalala with FS-level snapshots + flatpak + distrobox + a kitchen sink

      look_what_they_need_to_mimic_the_fraction_of_our_power.png

      • GuybrushThreepwo0d@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t consider myself a dumb person but I couldn’t figure out nix when last I decided to play with it. Theoretically it seems super interesting to me, but I really just can’t dedicate the time again now to learn that esoteric syntax.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      all the more reason to sunlight these old packaging formats and move to universal solutions like flatpak and nix