this is just a meme, I know that everyone is different and not all GNOME or KDE users are like that!!

  • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Kde is minimal now? Doesn’t it require a GPU? Aren’t there animations?

    I remember trying it out a few years back on my laptop from 2012 and it was unusably slow. Like 10 seconds just to open the menu.

    Xfce ran just fine though. That’s a minimal DE.

    • ugh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s all relative. Ubuntu desktop is minimal compared to Windows, and I’ve found KDE to run much better than default Ubuntu. It’s lightweight for how much it offers.

    • prunerye@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Needing a GPU might be hyperbole, but no, it’ll still be slow on older hardware. It looks lightweight on neofetch since, at rest, the RAM will appear as low as XFCE’s, but it’s not nearly as snappy.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Actually I tried out KDE Plasma on my grandmother’s budget laptop from about the same time. It was a little too slow with default settings, but once I killed the animations (can be done in Settings app) it ran pretty well. It ran a whole hell of a lot better than the Windows it came with.

      I also tested KDE vs XFCE in my old gaming computer, and I actually managed to get slightly less RAM usage in KDE than XFCE, so long as no plugins were used.

      Both systems were tested with Debian 12. On the gaming PC, I actually used the XFCE iso, so it was installed first.

      So depending on how your distro ships the default KDE Plasma settings or how you set it up, it actually can be a lightweight option compared with XFCE.