Summary

Andrius Kubilius, the EU’s nominee for Defense Commissioner, emphasized the need for increased European defense spending in response to Russian threats, rather than demands from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump.

At his confirmation hearing, Kubilius noted that Europe has boosted defense budgets since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

He stressed that intelligence suggests Russia could test EU or NATO resolve by the end of the decade, making enhanced military readiness essential for deterrence.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    As much as I hate to hear about war spending increasing planet-wide, it’s definitely dawning on our allies that depending on the US for protection and support is no longer a tenable position. It might turn out to be a good thing that more countries develop a modern military apparatus, though, particularly as there are several Putin-type heads of state in the world.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      particularly as there are several Putin-type heads of state in the world

      One has even been recently elected, just not as cunning and rather more stupid.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly. No country should have the military spending that the US does. It’s too much power in one place. I understand the cold war made it necessary though.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      More nuclear warheads as well. Not saying that’s a good thing, but it seems to be the only real deterrent.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I keep hoping someone will slip a nuke or two to Palestine so that whole business can be stopped, but I don’t think it’ll ever happen.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, our Kurdish allies learned the hard way not to depend on US support during Trump’s first term, and honestly, I’d love it if he pulls our country out of more wars, even if he does it for the wrong reasons. I’ve never supported the US being the policemen of the world.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The US isn’t in anything right now. It’s deployed (it always is), but not in active hostilities.

          (Unless I’m missing something in Central or South America)

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The US military is currently directly involved in fighting in Yemen and Somalia. It’s relatively small-scale, but it is happening

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean, that we know of.

            Clinton was fairly brilliant in branding his wars as ‘peacekeeping actions’ and Obama rebranded civilians as ‘enemy combatants’, so while yes it may be unofficial, we’re still essentially at war everywhere.

              • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s a good question, I think.

                I know most people don’t, but I consume a few foreign news sources myself. It helps to lend a broader perspective on US governance, and with the US press running cover for fascists, it’s an increasingly valuable way to learn more about US events.