The Spanish government has announced it will block two ships—Denver and Seletar—operated by shipping giant Maersk and carrying military cargo bound for Israel, from docking at the port of Algeciras. This decision comes just days after the Mask off Maersk campaign released a report exposing the company’s regular use of the Spanish port for transferring cargo that enables the ongoing genocide against Palestinians, despite Spain’s stated arms embargo.

Researchers from the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) and Progressive International (PI), who contributed to the report, told Peoples Dispatch that it is unclear whether Pedro Sánchez’s administration was genuinely unaware of the shipments or deliberately chose to look the other way. What is clear, however, is that since Sánchez announced the embargo in May, Maersk has succeeded in delivering thousands of tons of military cargo to Israel. It appears that Maersk typically sends one ship per week from New Jersey to Spain, carrying around 1,000 tons of military cargo destined for the Israeli military, the report states.

These shipments end up being used in Gaza, facilitating the killing, torture, and kidnapping of Palestinians. In recent months, Maersk has transported aircraft parts, armored vehicles, and projectile bodies—much of which has been essentially subsidized by US tax dollars. The shipments also included nearly 300 tons of goods labeled as “diplomatic cargo,” a classification that, according to PYM and PI researchers, is undoubtedly being used to obscure the true nature of the containers. This is one of several strategies used to evade oversight over shipments bound for Israel; others include submitting blank designations and relying on freight forwarders to mask the trace of what is being transported.

These entities, including Interglobal Forwarding Services (IFS) used by Israel, can get very creative in how they describe cargo. The Mask off Maersk report documents such practices and makes it clear that shipments bound for Israel should undergo regular oversight and inspection in order to stop ammunition and other military cargo being transported there. Between 2011 and 2014, for example, IFS managed to transport over 16,000 tons of “diplomatic” cargo on Maersk ships, according to the report. This designation appears to establish a stable supply chain of goods whose true nature remains concealed from customs authorities and the public, PYM and PI warn.

Maersk is fully aware of these operations, as well as of the nature of the cargo its ships transport, and could halt them immediately if it chose to, the report’s authors told Peoples Dispatch. However, it continues to enable this flow of deadly cargo, fueling the genocide. As a result, responsibility to block these shipments now lies with the governments of the countries whose ports are used in the transfers. Researchers noted that Morocco, Egypt, Italy, and Turkey must all be held to the same scrutiny as Spanish authorities. For instance, after being denied access to Spanish ports, the Maersk Denver sought permission to dock in Tangier, Morocco, sparking a BDS call urging local activists to mobilize and prevent this. Reports that Mediterranean ports might allow these ships to dock are deeply troubling and, moreover, stand in violation of several UN resolutions and recommendations.

The researchers emphasize that pressure must continue on the Sánchez administration until it commits to inspect every Maersk vessel originating from the US and carrying cargo to Israel, given the practices highlighted in the report. “These vessels must be blocked from docking—nothing more and nothing less,” stated PYM and PI activists.

Without grassroots pressure, governments are likely to ignore public opposition and continue allowing military cargo to flow to Israel through their logistical hubs. What’s needed now, according to the researchers, is a stronger mobilization of trade unions and workers’ actions against these shipments. For example, in October, dockworkers at Athens’ Piraeus port successfully blocked a shipment of ammunition destined for Israel.

Though such direct action triggers government repression, PYM and PI researchers argue that it remains one of the few effective ways to disrupt and halt Israel’s arms supply chain. The two Maersk ships Spain decided to block are not the only ones expected to bring more weapons to Israel—but the full list can be stopped through strong workplace mobilizations. Advocacy alone will not be enough to get the governments to act against the genocide in Palestine; only a people-led strategy, with trade unions playing a central role, can accomplish this goal.

Archive link

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    i had a negative opinion of the spanish government because of brutally they cracked down on catalonian independence; but their actions in isreal has changed my mind and i wish that they had a bigger role to play in the international stage to affect change.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Israel screamed through the minute of silence for Spanish victims of floods in Valencia because of the weapons embargo. Israelis clearly do not like Spain. Which makes me like Spain.

      This post makes it even better.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            with the trump going after arizona to get kari lake into power; agitators enshitifying hexbear; and isreali spooks triggering violence, it’s clear we’re heading into a new era of right wing agitation and i hope that the accelerationism leads to something like ubi once the dust settles since we got social security and unemployment the last time things were this bad.

    • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I am a huge spain cuck for reasons i will be automatically biased but i heard its because 1. historically catalonia is basically insignifacant 2. a lot of catalonian rich people want to pay less taxes so they want to be independent and then influence politians with money. I also heard from some of my catalonian friends that they wouldnt care but they wanna stay in the eu so thats why they support staying a part of spain. Of course as i said i am baised and this is what ive heard from biased people and i still dont support what they did its just an explanation NOT AN EXCUSE. Also spain gets a lot of hate for stuff that other countries also do but i think thats a good thing because it creates a higher standard.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t understand the recent-ish Catalan independence movement very well, but the more I looked into it the more it seemed… weirdly astroturfed by petit bourgeois interests. I wanted to be excited about it, and would have been if it had been a proletarian-driven movement. I was even less excited about Madrid’s handling of it, though.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        it was astroturfed by russia at first then driven by the petite bourgeois; but it took on a life of its own with the people and gained popular support by itself thanks to the scottish referendum.

        my gripe is how the spanish cracked down on the election w police forces despite it being peaceful and reacting w such a heavy hand has caused follow on problems that, some of which, are affecting the flood efforts. those same problems also make it apparent that the monarchy is now hated in catalonia as much as they are in basque country in the videos of people responding to the king’s visit.

        the monarchy still enjoys widespread throughout spain, but by an uncomfortably slim margin; if it were the 19th century, they would have been overthrown… again.

        • fadelkon@info.prou.be
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          The monarchy has been hated since it was reestablished. Pre-referendum times, there are soccer final (la copa del Rey) between Catalan and Basque clubs, giving the back and whistling so hard to the Spanish anthem, that the Spanish National TV disconnected the live sound and played the hymn on top.

          There are also public cases of prosecution against people burning pictures of the (former) king, for a very useful law there is called “injurias contra la corona y la bandera”. And so on.

          After Franco, they didn’t do a referendum about the monarchy established by Franco because polls told they may lose it, in favour of a republic. You know, the so called “Democratic transition” was more of a “transaction”. Same Police, same judges, same symbols, same politicians, same richmen.

        • fadelkon@info.prou.be
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Btw are you confusing Catalunya and València? How do you relate the referendum with the floods management? I don’t want to sound harsh, but I suspect confusion and reductionism >.<U

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            i don’t think it’s harsh and i think that pointing this out is warranted for the people looking at this exchange and learning from it.

            my experiences as an american born spanish speaker in the american tech industry; my experiences with my formerly illegal mexican family and how it relates to trump’s election win; and lemmy’s ignorance of the current events in spain despite spain being one the clearest examples of a western hegemony that won’t passively yield to the gazan genocide proves that this kind of interaction is necessary.

            to answer your question: yes i am aware. the government is clearly struggling to keep spain to together since they perpetually have to form coalitions to govern instead of one party governing by itself like it is in the us or the uk. i’ve used the basque and catalonians as examples to help describe the political background for valencia and the spanish government and the monarchy. it’s continued presence in the discourse has turned from a digression into the main point in this thread and i think the conditions i mentioned earlier are some of the reasons why.

      • redrum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        There were also an independist anticapitalist catalan left in that struggle, but yes, we were minority.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        they’ve been ostracized in living memory by the west for franco and the eu puts them at the kid’s table because their socialist heavy political zeitgeist and all despite having their own well-known world-encompassing empirical hegemony of their own.

        like the russians, seeing their influence descend to almost irrelevancy despite a history of the former serves a cultural unifier that the spanish desperately need right now; so if anyone in the west would be amenable to a change, it would be them and i’m certain that my government is aware and taking actions to mitigate it.

    • testingtesting123@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      You realize in 2017 it was a different government right? Right now is a left coalition supported by nationalist parties, including the ones (ERC and a bit by Junts) that declare independence in 2017.

      Actually regarding Israel support, Junts (right catalan nationalist) supports Israel historically, while PSOE and specially IU (left spanish) has supported more Palestine and the two states solution.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m aware and both the previous and current coalitions still pursue the leader of the Catalan movement despite the heavy political costs it incures from its eu neighbors and the catalonians; indicating that they have the same priorities as it applies to their independence.

        • testingtesting123@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The coalition from last two terms is basically the same (left + far left). For example Junqueras (ERC) was pardonned by the current government and Puidgemont (Junts) was part of the global pardon during the second term. Judges are not controlled by the government, that’s why there is still some aftermath, but it should be applied within the global pardon.

          Also, the reality is that the global pursue of independence have fallen below majority (polls done by previous ERC government) and with a current Catalan president from socialists (part of spanish left) after the elections …