I’m not proposing anything here, I’m curious what you all think of the future.

What is your vision for what you want Linux to be?

I often read about wanting a smooth desktop experience like on MacOS, or having all the hardware and applications supported like Windows, or the convenience of Google products (mail, cloud storage, docs), etc.

A few years ago people were talking about convergence of phone/desktop, i.e. you plug your phone into a big screen and keyboard and it’s now your desktop computer. That’s one vision. ChromeOS has its “everything is in the cloud” vision. Stallman has his vision where no matter what it is, the most important part is that it’s free software.

If you could decide the future of personal computing, what would it be?

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My favorite idea is Linux or Android-derived, or a completely new, Rust-based AGPL-licensed OS, running on 100% open RISC-V hardware. Same for its phone equivalent. All chips must be open, no secret code in them.

  • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish distro’s would combine efforts much more so we have a better desktop experience. Do we really need 15 window managers when we could have 2 or 3 much better ones.

    Unify to a single package manager, they are all functionally the same.

    Standardize on flatpacks and abandon snaps and appimage

    • tar_xf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I like the option to pick different package managers but it would behoove the community to actually settle on a package format. Making a deb or rpm are very different processes and while containers are nice for server side stuff I wish there was something easier for desktop

      • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that the processes are so different, is part of the problem. Developers need to spend the same effort 3 or 4 times.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly my biggest hope is some generally accepted way to install software that is consistent among distros. I’m leaning toward liking flatpak for this currently, but I also like how appimage works too.

    It is really close now, close enough I’ve dropped windows entirely at home, but occasionally there’s still something I’ll stumble across that officially only has Deb or rpm download options and if I try from my distro package manager it fails for one reason or another and I give up, just skip it, and be disappointed for a bit.

    Oh and support from devs of games at least as far to get anti-cheat stuff to work via proton, but I avoid a vast majority of those games even on windows because their anti-cheat can be so system invasive…

    • Raspin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Packaging software for linux is an insane problem. All distributions are so similar yet so different, all of these nuisances prevent you from making much assumptions about the host OS which for instance forced flatpak to be basically a generic distro you run apps on. For obvious reasons it’s not an ideal situation, memory consumption is bad, performance in various ways is impacted. I believe that the true packaging format will have to cut some corners and be specific by design to smaller set of distributions. Pretty much how snaps are built around Ubuntu, which imo. is a necessary compromise to have something reasonably fast and lightweight.

  • jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Accessible for everyone.

    If the desktop UX has very good screen readers, keyboard navigation, voice to text etc., I believe its benefits would automatically spill over to all.

    Also it would retain the UI / UX experts who become forced to abandon Linux for macOS which maintains a niche in this.

  • Snoopy@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    An immutable OS that run all app whatever are their package distribution.

    Later a full OS rewritten in Rust with goods tools that share folder’s content accross all devices and mass storage device as syncthing do.

    Let’s imagine a button where you click on add devices, then you scan the QR code and chose which folder you want to share. :)

  • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just want it to become more popular and easy to use while remaining free (like to buy, hot take I know) and libre.

    I want it to be something I can endorse to all my friends, even the friends that almost never use computers and barely know what a filesystem is

    my hope is that after this point of it being popular and accessable, FOSS principles will start to gain more traction in spaces like mobile phones and car head units. there will always be proprietary OS’s and software, but in my ideal world FOSS is at least an equal competitor, not just a a niche thing that only super involved computer people get into

  • Killercat103@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be more mainstream granted it isn’t because of a shitty locked down distro incompatible with the others.

    What I love most abou Linux is its freedom. It doesn’t try screwing me over for their own benefit, gives me full control of the system and is broken down into components. Having the underlying system foss for many is great to provide and make it easier to adopt more ethical software for computing.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The RedHat and Canonical oligarchs are well underway in achieving their windows-like linux desktop through systemd and flatpaks and what not, so we may see a small but highly deployed number of immutable distros becoming the forced de-facto standard.

    Microsoft continues their new approach at EEEing linux through WSL Azure, and everyone’s happy about it.

    Torvalds will eventually die, as will Stallman, so all that’ll be left are the communities, which unfortunately don’t have that much strength/voice.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Steam Deck gets more popular.

    Steam console released with improved multi user experience and VR.

    PlayStation sales drop in growth.

    Steam OS released, PCs can use it with generic kernels.

    Gaming PC manufacturers offer steam OS as a preinstalled.

    PC manufacturers start to offer popular distros preinstalled.

    System 76 puts their in house laptops into Best Buy shelves.

    Adobe and Office no longer stuck on Windows and are distributed as wasm applications.

  • glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope selfhosting becomes even more convenient. It already is for tech savy people, but I mean ‘buy a Pi and press a button’-easy. It would take away the power of so many big companies.

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d go a few levels deeper: the kernel development process seems to become more and more dysfunctional. Legacy code hindering innovation, bad people being bottlenecks and this absurdly ancient “send a patch via mail” process.

    Currently, that’s only sand in the gears, but if it gets worse, this could seriously threaten the future.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For Linux desktop to grow past the single digit market share it is at today. It needs to be led by tech visionaries not by code evangelists . The average user doesn’t care about if it’s running Wayland or x11 or whatever shit you name it they only care about their OS having all the features they need and support all the latest hardware they buy.

    Add to that any average Joe would freeze at the prospect of having to enter a command line to maintain their computer or use their firewall. In short for Linux to grow it needs to copy windows or macOS otherwise it will keep being used by nerds and sys admins

  • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Better documentation for any distribution not called Arch. Better bugtrackers for all major projects? (KDE, Thunderbird etc)

      • 257m@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m surprised how great BSDs documentation is despite having a smaller userbase than even linux. Probably a result of less fragmentation.

        • intrepid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Less fragmentation is part of the reason. The other part is that BSDs mandate documentation for their component software. Documentation by developers is obviously better than those created by regular users (like the arch wiki). Arch wiki is actually phenomenal considering that it’s by the user community.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the things I really dislike about Linux is how when setting up, there’s a bunch of things you need to troubleshoot, look them up on the forums even though you haven’t really done anything wrong, it’s just how some software works or there’s a bug or there’s some weird setting that’s incompatible with your system.

    I wish there were better defaults for software in the future or just better compatibility/more bugfixes so these cases get rarer and rarer, making it comparable to initial windows experience.