cross-posted from: https://futurology.today/post/2910566

Alibaba’s Qwen team just released QwQ-32B-Preview, a powerful new open-source AI reasoning model that can reason step-by-step through challenging problems and directly competes with OpenAI’s o1 series across benchmarks.

The details:

QwQ features a 32K context window, outperforming o1-mini and competing with o1-preview on key math and reasoning benchmarks.

The model was tested across several of the most challenging math and programming benchmarks, showing major advances in deep reasoning.

QwQ demonstrates ‘deep introspection,’ talking through problems step-by-step and questioning and examining its own answers to reason to a solution.

The Qwen team noted several issues in the Preview model, including getting stuck in reasoning loops, struggling with common sense, and language mixing.

Why it matters: Between QwQ and DeepSeek, open-source reasoning models are here — and Chinese firms are absolutely cooking with new models that nearly match the current top closed leaders. Has OpenAI’s moat dried up, or does the AI leader have something special up its sleeve before the end of the year?

  • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    26 days ago

    https://www.wired.com/story/google-and-microsofts-chatbots-refuse-election-questions/

    There are plenty of examples of Ai either refusing to discuss subjects of the elections (I remember meta ai basically just saying “I’m learning how to respond to these questions.” Or in the above case, just hand waving away clear issues of wrong doing.

    Chat gpt advanced voice mode would constantly activate its guardrails when asked about trump or “politically charged” topics.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      No, no, no.

      You made the bullshit claim that no western model would. That is utterly false, 2 models out of thousands that don’t isn’t an example of your claim.