vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoTrump classified documents judge is target of more than 1,000 complaints, appeals court revealswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkTrump classified documents judge is target of more than 1,000 complaints, appeals court revealswww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoCan you expand more on the election interference part? Totally understand inciting an insurrection to be interference, but using campaign funds to manage public relations problems seems a legitimate use.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoSo the falsifying is the illegal bit. The rest of the tweet is moralising.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoYeah, if he was upfront about things then there would be no criminal case However saying he set up shell companies to carry out falsification isn’t moralising
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoWriting “disgusting transactions” is moralistic. Doesn’t help to win over Republicans.
minus-squaressladam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoI think you misread. He said “disguising”, which only means intent to keep hidden by masking the truth.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThe only disgusting (immoral) part of this is Trump cheating on his wife. Everything else could have been achieved perfectly legally (i.e. without disgust) if Trump had been smart. I don’t want to disgust you, but “intending to keep things hidden by masking the truth” is practically the definition of politics.
minus-squaresuction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoDude, you have trouble reading. It says “disguising”. Your side really fails at the most basic human functions, over and over again.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoAnd finding something disgusting is a moral position.
Can you expand more on the election interference part?
Totally understand inciting an insurrection to be interference, but using campaign funds to manage public relations problems seems a legitimate use.
So the falsifying is the illegal bit.
The rest of the tweet is moralising.
Yeah, if he was upfront about things then there would be no criminal case
However saying he set up shell companies to carry out falsification isn’t moralising
Writing “disgusting transactions” is moralistic.
Doesn’t help to win over Republicans.
I think you misread. He said “disguising”, which only means intent to keep hidden by masking the truth.
The only disgusting (immoral) part of this is Trump cheating on his wife.
Everything else could have been achieved perfectly legally (i.e. without disgust) if Trump had been smart.
I don’t want to disgust you, but “intending to keep things hidden by masking the truth” is practically the definition of politics.
Dude, you have trouble reading. It says “disguising”. Your side really fails at the most basic human functions, over and over again.
And finding something disgusting is a moral position.