It’s all made from our data, anyway, so it should be ours to use as we want

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It wouldn’t be. It would still work. It just wouldn’t be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost.

    But all of this ignores the real issue - you’re not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.

    • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It does discourages the use of unauthorised data. If stealing doesn’t give you competitive advantage, it’s not really worth the risk and cost of stealing it in the first place.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If you can still use it after you stole it, as opposed to not being able to use it at all… Then it does give you an incentive

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If you did all the work and potentially criminal collection of data, but everyone else gets the benefit as well, that is not an incentive. You underestimate how selfish corporations can be.

          OpenAI wouldn’t stay at the forefront of LLM if every competitor gets to use the model they spent money on training.