sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2年前Young climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square229fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down17
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comsv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2年前message-square229fedilink
minus-squarepedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2年前Except that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.
minus-squareuis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前 This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials. You mean under ground from where it was dug out?
minus-squarepedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前The plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.
minus-squareuis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前You mean water under ground? It was in contact million years before any of us was born.
minus-squarepedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2年前Million years were sufficient for the radioactivity to decay before life started to evolve on earth.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前Then how does it fuel nuclear reactors?
Except that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.
You mean under ground from where it was dug out?
The plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.
You mean water under ground? It was in contact million years before any of us was born.
Million years were sufficient for the radioactivity to decay before life started to evolve on earth.
Then how does it fuel nuclear reactors?