So if GNOME does something everyone else is not doing, they’re “fucking up”, but if they follow what someone else has done that you like, they’re just creating a “cheap copy”? How do they win?
MissionCenter is a cheap copy of Windows Task Manager (except it’s missing a few tabs, menu items, columns, etc.), so I guess this must be a free copy, then?
The proposed mockup seems to be a combination of the best features of MissionCenter and Resources. With MissionCenter still lacking many festures present in even Gnome’s minimalistic alternative, I think extending these existing products to actually make a useful Task Manager alternative is a benefit to everyone.
Im not a big fan of gnome, but this system monitor update is pretty legit
Looks like a cheap copy of MissionCenter… https://flathub.org/apps/io.missioncenter.MissionCenter
And Boxes looked like a cheap copy of Virtualbox. But now it’s my daily driver because how good it is
Boxes is so… damn… unbearably… slow. Subpar virtualization.
So if GNOME does something everyone else is not doing, they’re “fucking up”, but if they follow what someone else has done that you like, they’re just creating a “cheap copy”? How do they win?
MissionCenter is a cheap copy of Windows Task Manager (except it’s missing a few tabs, menu items, columns, etc.), so I guess this must be a free copy, then?
The proposed mockup seems to be a combination of the best features of MissionCenter and Resources. With MissionCenter still lacking many festures present in even Gnome’s minimalistic alternative, I think extending these existing products to actually make a useful Task Manager alternative is a benefit to everyone.