• Bayz0r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Valve guy doesn’t run a publicly owned company. But go on, keep spewing.

    • NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How does that make a difference? Anyhow, I meant to write privately owned. My mistake.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference is that a hostile takeover can’t happen.

        Unless the founder still owns a majority of the shares, you can take control of a public company without needing the consent of the board (and CEO, founder, etc)

        • BeAware@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          A hostile takeover doesn’t have to happen. If Gaben decides “fuck you all” and decides to close the company, then there’s not a damn thing you can do about it. It’s his company and it doesn’t owe you the privilege of continuing to exist.

      • Bayz0r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it doesn’t make much difference, I just commented on the low-hanging fruit of what was clearly incorrect.

        My bigger problem is with your fear-mongering and the gibberish that assumes that self-hosted FOSS solutions are somehow a viable alternative for the majority of users. I’ll pick privacy-compromised convenient products 9 times out of 10 and actually spend my time doing things I want to do, and I’m pretty bored reading all the privacy nutjobs trying to tell me how to do things.