Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoWait, why is the White House using Starlink to ‘improve Wi-Fi’?www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1388arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1384arrow-down1external-linkWait, why is the White House using Starlink to ‘improve Wi-Fi’?www.theverge.comTony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square50fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·4 months agoMay be that official comms are MITMed by the three letters, as they should be, and they need a secure channel to commit treason on.
minus-squarerumba@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 months ago , as they should be, and they need a secure channel to commit treason on. This is the $64,000 answer. It gives them a private, unmonitored channel to contact their handlers. It also gives their handlers a private channel to touch their network. Wonder if there are any zerodays in starlinks config…
May be that official comms are MITMed by the three letters, as they should be, and they need a secure channel to commit treason on.
This is the $64,000 answer. It gives them a private, unmonitored channel to contact their handlers.
It also gives their handlers a private channel to touch their network.
Wonder if there are any zerodays in starlinks config…