• TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1年前

            He asked that the state GOP revoke their endorsement of him. That’s something.

            His previous comments imply some internalized homophobia, but this recent line of rhetoric from the Colorado GOP is obviously eliminationist, and he seems to have realized it. Maybe it leads to him more closely examining his previous attitudes, maybe it doesn’t.

            I’m not saying he’s like, a good dude. Just worth noting that he found a line he wouldn’t cross.

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1年前

              I don’t think that getting driven out of this party by bigots counts as “moving in the right direction“.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1年前

      No he didn’t:

      …and arguing that they don’t represent Republican views.

      He’s still in fucking denial.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1年前

        I’m just thinking. Isn’t republic fancy word for representative democracy? As opposed to direct democracy.

        In representative democracy people vote for people who vote for law, while in direct democracy people vote for law.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6か月前

          No but yes but no.

          I’m not sure you are serious/genuine here but I’m also not sure you deserve the downvotes and I have some time to kill.

          “Republic” is “rule by the people” (Rex public). It means the same as democracy (“people rule”). The only difference is Latin vs Greek.

          As used in the US, your description kinda-sorta covers the principles that the parties once maybe kinda stood for 150 years ago or so. (Something like “more federal power / less federal power”).

          In reality these days they’re just labels for two different groups, and the words have no connection in this context, it’s just an historical note.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6か月前

            I was talking about meaning in entire world, not american local dialect.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6か月前

              That’s fine.

              In that case you can feel free to ignore the US-specific portion and go back to the first “no, they are synonyms” statement.